Our February guest blog comes from our call recording friends Computertel. Computertel supply cost-effective solutions for call recording, employee appraisal software, speech analytics, call handling and performance management solutions.
Yesterday, I got home to find that a bailiff had visited my home and left a seizure notice through my door for a person with the same surname but totally different forenames to that of my husband! He wasn’t expecting it and he shouldn’t have received it!
My bemused and perplexed husband then made a phone call to the bailiff, shown in the correspondence, and advised him that no person by the name on the notice lived at, or was associated with the address. The bailiff replied that “he had only visited the address given by the courts!”
Being a supportive wife, I of course did not find it highly amusing that the bailiff had gone into our back garden and cited our rather rustic wooden garden furniture to be seized, against a £ 3,000.00 debt! I smothered my giggles behind my wine glass quite well, I thought!
By this time, it was well after the courts had finished for the day, so after a quick Google ™ search couldn’t show us anything useful, my husband resigned himself to wait until the second the courts opened the following morning to “state his case”.
To sum up, your honour, the court advised that our address was not associated with the original paperwork issued. Allegedly, the information relayed to the bailiff was totally different from what the courts had issued, but for some obscure reason the bailiff decided to put the letter through our door and snoop at our furniture. The court also provided the contact details of the company who had brought the case in front of the court, so my irate husband then thought he’d share his frustrations with this company too, who was assertively asked to provide written confirmation that our address and my husband were in no way connected to this case and that there would be no seizure of our “highly valuable” garden furniture.
The point of my preamble today is that if someone had simply verified the information correctly before, then this problem would never have happened and I couldn’t be blogging you about it now.
The details were issued by phone, so if they had been able to record the phone call(s) to double check the instructions, life would now be simpler for up to 3 people who have now been involved in writing the wrongs of some mis-information.
Call recording is not only suitable for call centres, smaller organisations that do business over the phone, be it land line or mobile, could all benefit from being able to verify actual information to help them work more accurately, confidently and professionally.
So, next time you look at buying or upgrading your Telcare telephony equipment, why not ask your account manager to discuss call recording options too?
For any enquiries please feel free to contact us or go directly to Sarah Jane or Brendan at Computertel 01474 561111








